🔗 Share this article

Prosecutors told the tribunal that law enforcement had reasonable suspicions indicating Tommy Robinson's mobile held material relevant to acts of terrorism when they stopped him in the previous year as he attempted to depart from the UK.

Denial to Give Phone Pin

The far-right activist, using his real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, reportedly declined to hand over his password to police, claiming it included journalist content.” This occurred after he was intercepted at the Channel tunnel on July 28, 2024.

Trial Claims on Anti-Terror Authority

On the final day of the trial, state lawyer the prosecution argued that the anti-terror authorities employed by law enforcement are intended to permit information collection. She claimed that police had reasonable suspicion to think Robinson still have links to far-right activists, even after the dissolution of the English Defence League (EDL).

“Although his membership of the EDL has ceased, his beliefs have not gone away. He is recognized for holding those opinions and therefore it is a reasonable suspicion to believe that on his telephone there could be information pertaining to acts of terrorism,” she told Westminster magistrates court.

The prosecutor continued, His opinions – to which he is entitled – were not the focus for their attention on 28 July. It was his connection to individuals who are possibly engaged in prohibited activities.”

Details of the Detention

The campaigner had turned up alone at the Channel tunnel in a silver Bentley belonging to a acquaintance and was traveling to the holiday destination of the Spanish coast with over £13,000 in a small bag, the court heard.

The money was said to have been from a donation drive to offset costs from arranging a large demonstration that occurred the day before in a London landmark.

Defense Submissions

The defendant, who denies non-compliance with anti-terror laws during the encounter on July 28 of the previous year, faces up to three months in prison or a possible £2,500 fine if convicted.

His barrister, Alisdair Williamson KC, said in closing submissions that counter-terrorism police who stopped Robinson had engaged in a speculative search” and that he had been unlawfully detained.

Referring to testimony from officers who stated they contacted “partner agencies” after detaining him, the defense lawyer claimed this was a reference to the intelligence agencies and that no evidence had been presented from MI5 to suggest his client was a security threat.

Williamson said the police action was “discriminatory” because it was based to a large extent on a protected characteristic.” He stated that the main factor” on the choice to stop him was recognizing his identity”.

He noted that officers had used an “extraordinary power that must be properly policed” to try to discover details that was previously available. The barrister suggested that Robinson journeyed to Benidorm frequently, which should have reduced the officers’ concerns about him.

Legal Costs and Verdict Date

The activist claimed that his legal costs in the proceedings were being covered by the tech billionaire, the proprietor of social media and electric car companies, who has emerged as an supporter of the campaigner and recently spoke at a gathering organized by him in the capital via a online broadcast.

A proposed date of next Tuesday for the decision was changed by the district judge, Sam Goozee, after Williamson explained his client was due to be a invitee of the Israel's administration from the midweek and would not come back until October 25.

{“I wouldn’t trouble you if this was a trip to Benidorm. I would ask him to rearrange it but he is a guest of a foreign government,” stated Williamson.

The judge announced he would deliver his ruling on the morning of 4 November.